Evaluate operational performance from the documents your team already works with
PugID analyses operations documents held in Google Drive or SharePoint. A team member picks an operations-specific question. PugID finds the relevant files and returns a structured result built from those documents. The team can then cross-check the result with source records before applying it in an operational review or decision.

Consolidate operational evidence into a single review
An operations review may rely on SOPs, production summaries, maintenance schedules, work-order logs, quality reports, supplier scorecards and meeting notes. When those files are scattered across separate folders, teams spend time locating the current version and reconciling definitions before they can discuss the issue.
PugID operates at that document layer. It applies a selected Operations question to locate relevant material in connected Google Drive or SharePoint folders and deliver a structured result. It does not replace ERP, CMMS, MES, warehouse, quality or live business-intelligence systems. Governed figures should still be verified in their system of record.
Select the operational question you need to review
The supplied Operations catalogue contains focused questions for performance, delivery, maintenance, quality and improvement work. The examples below retain the intent of eight catalogue rows.
Transition from folders to a reviewable result

Connect approved folders.
Link the Google Drive or SharePoint locations that hold the documents relevant to the review.
Pick one Operations question.
Select the prompt that fits the operational issue or reporting task.
Examine the structured result.
Check it against source documents and governed systems, resolve conflicts and assign an accountable owner before taking action.
Measure the evaluation, not a promised ROI
A controlled trial can demonstrate whether the same review requires fewer manual retrieval steps, whether the result makes source conflicts easier to spot and whether owners finish the review with clearer actions. Capture the baseline, document set, reviewer and acceptance criteria before testing. Do not offer an estimated saving as a product guarantee.
Outcomes depend on the files connected, their dates and the definitions they use. When two reports disagree on throughput, OTD or inventory, the discrepancy should be investigated rather than averaged away. PugID organises document evidence; the responsible operations team validates and acts on it.
Keep access and data handling within scope
PugID states that connections are encrypted, credentials are not stored, and documents and results are not retained permanently. It further states that temporary analysis data is automatically deleted after eight hours.
Before linking production, workforce, safety, supplier or commercial records, verify folder permissions, contractual terms, processing details and internal policies. Use non-personal or minimised data where feasible, particularly for incident and headcount material.
