Ask your product documents a focused question and review the evidence
PugID examines product management documents held in Google Drive or SharePoint. A team member selects a product-management-specific question. PugID identifies the relevant files and delivers a structured result drawn from those documents. The product team can then weigh the result against source files and governed product systems before applying it in a roadmap, prioritisation or release decision.
Product decisions seldom fit into a single file
A roadmap review can draw on strategy notes, research synthesis, feature requests, delivery updates and risk logs. Release readiness may rely on checklists, beta feedback, open issues and stakeholder minutes. When those files sit in separate folders, the team must rebuild the context before it can question the decision.
PugID operates at this document layer. It takes a chosen Product Management question, identifies relevant files in linked Google Drive or SharePoint folders, and returns a structured result. It does not replace product analytics, issue trackers, roadmapping tools, research repositories or live BI. Governed metrics and delivery status should still be confirmed in their source systems.
Begin with the product question under review
The supplied Product Management catalogue includes roadmap, prioritisation, research, adoption and release questions.
Move from source folders to a result you can review
Connect approved folders.
Link the Google Drive or SharePoint locations that hold the product documents relevant to the review.
Choose one Product Management question.
Pick the prompt that matches the roadmap, research, prioritisation or release task.
Review the structured result.
Compare it against source documents and governed systems, resolve conflicts and assign an accountable owner before acting.
Keep assumptions and evidence in view
Research summaries can combine segments. Prioritisation scores can rest on different assumptions. Roadmap documents may show a date that the delivery system no longer uses. A structured result can expose these differences, but it cannot settle which record or trade-off is authoritative.
Define the review period, approved folders, reviewer and acceptance criteria before testing. Evaluate whether the result makes missing evidence, inconsistent definitions and open actions easier to find. Do not convert a pilot observation into a promised improvement in velocity, adoption or revenue.
Keep access and data handling within scope
PugID states that connections are encrypted, credentials are not kept, and documents and results are not held permanently. It also states that temporary analysis data is deleted automatically after eight hours.
Before linking unreleased roadmap, customer research, pricing, partner or accessibility material, verify folder permissions, contractual terms, processing details and internal policy. Minimise personal data and use synthetic content in public screenshots.