Ask your strategy documents a focused question and review the evidence
PugID examines strategy and corporate development documents held in Google Drive or SharePoint. A team member selects a strategy-specific question, PugID identifies the relevant files, and it returns a structured result drawn from those documents. The result can then be checked against the source documents before being used in a planning, investment, partnership or portfolio decision.
Strategy work seldom arrives in one tidy file
A market-entry recommendation may draw on research reports, pricing studies, win-loss notes, operating plans and risk assessments. An acquisition discussion may rely on pipeline records, valuation models, diligence summaries and synergy assumptions. Each document can be useful, yet the overall decision still requires someone to locate the overlaps, expose the gaps and reconcile conflicting assumptions.
PugID is built for that document layer. It works with material already stored in Google Drive or SharePoint and uses a chosen department question to identify relevant files and return a structured summary. It does not make the strategy decision, verify an external market fact or substitute for a governed financial or transaction system.
Start with the question the decision truly needs
The supplied strategy catalogue contains focused prompts covering market analysis, corporate development, planning and portfolio review. These examples illustrate the intended scope.
Go from source documents to a reviewable result
Connect the approved folders.
Link the Google Drive or SharePoint locations containing the strategy documents relevant to the assignment.
Choose a single strategy question.
Pick the prompt that matches the decision, review or planning requirement.
Review the structured output.
Compare it against the source documents, investigate gaps and confirm assumptions before using it in a recommendation.
Define what the result can and cannot determine
A strategy result is only as fresh and complete as the connected documents. Market estimates may rely on different definitions. Valuation models may carry different dates. Portfolio reports may differ on the metric that matters. A good review should reveal where the map is precise and where the paper is still blank.
Assign a review owner for each prompt, note the source-of-truth system for governed figures and require professional review for investment, legal, people, regulatory and financial decisions. PugID can structure the document evidence; the accountable team still assesses the recommendation and its consequences.
Keep the information lifecycle contained
PugID states that connections use encryption, credentials are not stored, and documents and results are not kept permanently. It also says that temporary analysis data is automatically deleted after eight hours.
Before connecting confidential board, transaction, market or partner files, check folder permissions, contractual terms, processing details and internal policy requirements. Publish only the controls that PugID can verify at launch, and keep the source documents accessible for the reviewer who owns the final decision.
Test one strategic question against a controlled set of documents
Begin with a specific review like a scenario pack, market-entry plan or M&A pipeline summary. Connect only the folders approved for that purpose, examine the result against the underlying files and note what the team would need to fix before relying on it. The first useful output is a lens on the evidence, not a verdict from a machine.